First off I will say this.
In connection unto exodus 22: 28
In various early christian manuscripts it is written that numerous early female saints were given authority to supercede 1st timothy 2: 11.
And take control of christian faculties.
Through Roman's4: 7 to 8
Due to their sincere devotion to christ.
Revelation 8: 3 invokes this likewise.
Saint agnes " saint Agatha " saint thecla" plus numerous other female saints have this power.
Given to them.
By their dying and living for christ.
In hearts and spirits.
In this life.
so?
Regarding that subject?
who can say this woman here too is not given that holy right?
Most women are not.
According to scriptures of christianity.
I admit that to be true.
And factual.
Yes.
Yet a few clearly are.
Whose to say " on that note " whether or not this woman in this video is not one of the few women given that right?
Before christ?In this life?
Exactly.
yes.Eeeeeeeeee-eeeeeeeeee--- eee---
-----eeeeeexactly.
Now.
Moving on with this comment i will now say this.
Just for the appropriate sake of record"" just so the readers are aware'""
Let it be noted that
THERE ARE ANCIENT JEWISH MANUSCRIPTS in this existence ""WHICH ARE NOT CANONIZED TODAY" YET " THAT WERE CONSIDERED SACRED SCRIPTURE" BY THE EARLY CHRISTIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH AND JESUS"
JUST FOR THE SAKE OF APPROPRIATE RECORD; """
WHICH ACTUALLY STATE AND INDICATE TO MORTALS AND HUMANITY IN FACT THAT VARIOUS PRIOR CREATED HUMANS IN THIS LIFE" IN PREVIOUS FORMERLY CREATED EXISTENCES"ACTUALLY ATE OF CHRISTIANITYS TREE OF LIFE " CONNECTED TO GENESIS 3" 22" IN PREVIOUS EXISTENCES..
🤪🧝♀️🤡🏁🥳🚴♀️🤯🐍🧝♀️😩👨🦲😯😙😱😙🙂🐶🤯🐣
DUE TO THEIR APPROPRIATELY HONORING JESUS AND HID FATHER PURELY IN BYGONE CREATED EXISTENCES.
🤹♀️🤪🐶🐍🧝♀️🤡🥳😱😙🙂🤯😩🏁🚴♀️😱😗🙀🐣🏄♀️
THE SAME ANCIENT SCRIPTURES TESTIFY" IN UNISON" BY THE WAY " THAT " ONCE A CREATED BEING EATS OF THAT TREE A CREATED BEING BECOMES PURE.
AND MAKES BI SEXUALITY PURE.
🤹♀️🤪😙😱😮😗🤡🥳🙀🙂🐶🏄♀️😮🐶🥳😗🧝♀️🧝♀️
VARIOUS ANCIENT TEXTS " CONSIDERED SACRED BY THE EARLY APOSTLES OF CHRIST ALSO STATE " FOR THE RECORD" THAT" ONE SUCH BEING WHO PARTICIPATED OF THE AMBROSIAC TREE OF LIFES SUSTENENCES """ NECTARS"" AND DIVINE POWERS WAS THE BIBLICAL MAN DAVID..
.
WHO ATE OF A MINOR LEVEL OF THE NECTAR OF CHRISTIANITYS TREE OF LIFE. IN PRIOR EXISTENCES...
AS THEIR HAVE BEEN MANY DEVELOPMENTS OF "" AND REPLICAS OF CHRISTIANITYS ORIGINAL TREE OF LIFE.
THE MORE SENESECENT THE TREE" THE STRONGER IN EXTRACTING POWER IS THE FRUIT.
BY WHICH FACTOR , FOR EXAMPLE"
IF A CREATED BEING ATE OF SUCH A TREE 10 PRIOR EXISTENCES AGO" SUCH A BEING WOULD BE WAY MORE POWERFUL THEN DAVID.
IN THIS EXISTENCE..
OR ANY EXISTENCE.
FORTH COMING.
THAT IS A BASIC SUMMARY OF THAT SITUATION.
WHICH IS A TOPIC I DISCUSS MORE ADEQUATELY HERE.
ALBEIT THAT TOPIC IS NOT THE DIRECT POINT OF THIS NOTE.
TO GET TO THE POINT OF THIS NOTE?
IN SUMMARY I SHALL STATE THIS.
Christianity basically states AND TEACHES ALL that ""before the biblical man " david" met bathsheba the holy saintly biblical man NAMED ""THE LEGENDARY KING DAVID"" had already fornicated with 800 MORTAL women.
In this life.
Meaning
IN THIS EXISTENCE.
QUITE A LOT OF ROMPING.
IN SEXUAL ACTIVITIES AND PARTYING.
On that note.
HAPPILY.
WOULDNT YOU SAY?
So?
And GOD and christianity still called the great renowned biblical saint david righteous.
RIGHTEOUS!!!
DESPITE THAT TRUTH.
Meaning a summary of the words just spoken.
CHRISTIANITY MAKES THAT STATEMENT ENTIRELY CLEAR.
Which is basically a reflection of psalm 51: 10 and Roman's 4: 7 to 8.
Meaning?
David was sincere to christ.
Even in this life.
Despite David's minor immortality in this life.
And David's death.
In this life.
Too.
Immortals and gods and deities can die.
In any existence.
The prime immortal and obviously most superannuated immortal in this life"" jesus christ" is proof of that truth.
So?
What does that tell mortals?
In this life?
Obviously an immortal consecrates and purifies sex.
Even if an immortal takes a mortal as a lover.
In this life.
Deities do have that right.
Over mortals.
Because deities or immortals have already earned that right.
By their righteousness shown to christ.
In prior lives.
Which reflects revelation 22: 14 to 15.
Obviously.
Through their consumption of christianitys sacred tree of life.
At various points.
In prior existences.
Of which their are many levels.
Unknown to humans for the most part.
In any existence humans are created.
Living with immortals.
At various assigned points.
In this existence.
Through christianitys tree of life.
Despite the form such a tree takes.
Mortals do not have that right.
Therefore.
Meaning the right to bi sexuality.
Unless a deity gives them permission.
By taking a mortal as a lover.
In this life.
Regardless of whether a immortal is faithful to christ any longer " in this life" or not" the preceding information addressed is still true.
In each created existence which appears for created mortals.
And immortals.
In any existence.
Including this existence.
Matters between immortals and deities is " exactly just that.
That's the buisness of deities.
Whether a deity is faithful to christ or saved in jesus in this existence or not" is not really a mortals buisness.
It's the buisness of a mortal yo honor gods.
And goddesses.
For their devotion to christ.
In prior existences.
Of which most of christianitys mortal saints in this life are applied to likewise.
As the newest deities to created mortals and mankind.
As revelation 22: 14 to 15 and revelation 20: 1 to 6 basically confirm Tomball creation.
In no uncertain terms.
Obviously.
Which is a matter I also explain here.
In adequate detail.
For humans.
In this life.
Through c5q79 of the prophesies of nostradamus.
For all mankind.
In this life.
To see and give decent acclamation to.
In the 2nd last post.
Of such a website.
For all creation to presently see.
So?
On that note connect simple dots.
Connected to what jesus invokes for humanity in luke 4: 4.
Think about it.
People.
This matter of christianitys is not hard to figure out.
Ultimately.
And
Obviously such information addressed here is clearly accurate.
Too.
On matters relating to bisexuality.
Mortals do not have that right.
Because mortals have not earned that right.
Yet.
As hebrews 11: 37 to 38 and many other scriptures in christianity also warn all in this life.
When all the facts of such a topic are analysed properly these words addressed here are clearly factual.
Which also" once again" clearly invoke why david was given such rights.
When most arent.
In this life.
And " on that note" the following information addressed becomes quite rational and notable at this conjecture in time in this comment.
And that " people"" is simply this.
" if david hadn't made that one err?
In this life?
Regarding the christian gods ten simple commadments in this life.
By sleeping with uriah's wife?
ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANITY.
The christian scriptures absolutely verify " in no uncertain terms that " the biblical man david would rank among the highest in glorious holy virtues before The GOD OF ETERNAL GLORY.
ISRAELS SACRED GOD.
REGARDING a gathering of ALL christianitys SAINTS IN CHRISTIANITY.
ANYWHERE.
FROM ANY TIME PERIOD OF THIS EXISTENCE.
ANYTIME.
Anywhere.
Despite his failure.
With uriah.
In this life.
SO?
CONSIDER THAT STATEMENT.
PEOPLE.
THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY CLEAR THAT " DESPITE DAVID FORNICATING WILDLY WITH ALMOST 1000 WOMEN IN HIS LIFE "
In this existence"" WHILE LIVING AS A MORTAL IN THIS LIFE " THE PRIME CREATOR GOD OF ISRAEL " STILL CALLED DAVID RIGHTEOUS.
SO?
CONSIDER THAT.
NOW...
Christianity's facts in their entirety make those statements entirely clear.
Despite the ignorance of humans to that obvious truth.
In christianitys sacred holy scriptures.
So?
In summary to conclude this comment "" attached here" I now state this.
IF THAT IS TRUE
WHO IS ANYONE IN THIS WORLD """"mortal """ PRESENTLY TO SAY THIS WOMAN HERE IN THIS VIDEO ISNT HERSELF A GODDESS?
With those rights.
Too.
AND DOESNT HAVE THE RIGHT TO BISEXUALITY?
TOO?
In this life.
If your a mortal in this life you dont know that.
For sure.
So?
Therefore " logic invokes on this subject" that a created being be cautious" in analysing this situation.
As the lady in this video clearly believes she is doing right.
I am not decreeing she is wrong or right.
At this moment.
What I am saying" on that note" is " logic decrees a created being exercise caution in judging her.
for her decisions here.
Under such circumstances addressed.
That is my sole point.
In addressing this letter or comment.
Attached to this comment section of this video.
at this conjecture in time in human history.
As the various comments attached here in this video confirm so "" humans usually are always very backwards on true righteous logic on such matters.
Just as jesus warns all.
In luke 6: 26.
Til my appearance on earth.
In connection to c5q96 of the vaticinal statements of michel denote dame.
Touche.
On that note.
People of earth.
and ooo ..may you people of earth try to always keep the reality of christs real simple words in your sweet hearts.
And keep jolly too.
On that note
In obedience to christ.
Of course.
Yes.
Of course.
Now
On that note I now sign this letter as follows.
The original god of earths skies penned this comment.
My name ? coelus.
As
C5q79.
Of the quatrains of nostradamus
Invoke.
Wonderously.
Oo p.s.
In the comments here " a few people are stating" this lady wasnt exactly a preacher.
Before she did an about face on a
hypocritical church.
Really?
Where did you get that information?
No where in her work as a preacher did she not have authorization from church officials to preach. On her former churches pulpit.
So?
If every church official had given her the green light to preach at her former church then obviously that means she was a preacher.
As that is a type of ordaining.
Or ordination.
So?
In other words "" that literally"" is a definition to that word.
●●●●Ordained.●●●
Whether someone is ordained legally or not.
If all church officials have given a person verbal and written authorization to preach in a church " then obviously" that is a type of ordained preacher.
Whether legal by the state through a college or not.
Call a spade a spade?
Two plus three equals five?
A tortoise is a turtle.?
Yes. And yes and yes.
You get the point.
Okay.
